posted by ![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
nekare at 11:34pm on 12/12/2007
nekare at 11:34pm on 12/12/2007I go to F_W expecting to find delicious new wank about Twilight and what do I get? Some cunts bitching about an artist using photo references.
DUDE. Ever been to an actual art class? You have to use photo references. That's the only way to get better when you're starting and THEN, if you're good enough, you can go and do whatever the fuck you want with no reference whatsoever. It's no crime, promise. And if she's making a reference photo by maniping a few others, again, what the fuck is so wrong with that?
And even if it WAS all photoshop - fandom loves manips. Even if they're horrible and badly done. And yet I don't hear no one bitching about them. (except on their ugliness, with every right)
It's just so... stupid. And not even funny. I rank wanks from okay to OMG HOLY SHIT AWESOME based on funniness.
The artist's comeback, though? It's made of mother fucking WIN.
DUDE. Ever been to an actual art class? You have to use photo references. That's the only way to get better when you're starting and THEN, if you're good enough, you can go and do whatever the fuck you want with no reference whatsoever. It's no crime, promise. And if she's making a reference photo by maniping a few others, again, what the fuck is so wrong with that?
And even if it WAS all photoshop - fandom loves manips. Even if they're horrible and badly done. And yet I don't hear no one bitching about them. (except on their ugliness, with every right)
It's just so... stupid. And not even funny. I rank wanks from okay to OMG HOLY SHIT AWESOME based on funniness.
The artist's comeback, though? It's made of mother fucking WIN.
(no subject)
oh, and check out my latest post. I did not know R. Pattz is a fantastic hug-attacker.
(no subject)