posted by
nekare at 11:33pm on 13/01/2011
It sometimes weirds me out how fandom tends to allocate its book-love into characters that were never really called that, even if they could fit the profile - it was done to Remus, the apparently Shakespeare lover that was never really seen reading something that didn't involve magic (and that on the whole seemed to be more into magical creatures and magical theory), and fandom is doing it again to Arthur from Inception, which wasn't even seen holding a book throughout the entire movie.
I get that it's just filling in the blanks, but do we really want it so bad for our favorite character to be like us? And we are bookish people, on the whole, it takes a kind to actively read and write fic passionately. I don't mind it, exactly, for I too love books, and have been known to judge people on what they read. It just seems a bit odd, wanting to see ourselves in the characters we write and love - would it be the mildest way of self-insert?
How much of ourselves are we leaving behind when we write someone lovingly caress a book's spine and adore that old-book smell? Is it comparable to people writing Hermione be a Evanescence fan? It's an interesting thing to think about, in any case.
I get that it's just filling in the blanks, but do we really want it so bad for our favorite character to be like us? And we are bookish people, on the whole, it takes a kind to actively read and write fic passionately. I don't mind it, exactly, for I too love books, and have been known to judge people on what they read. It just seems a bit odd, wanting to see ourselves in the characters we write and love - would it be the mildest way of self-insert?
How much of ourselves are we leaving behind when we write someone lovingly caress a book's spine and adore that old-book smell? Is it comparable to people writing Hermione be a Evanescence fan? It's an interesting thing to think about, in any case.
(no subject)
It's interesting when it happens fandom-wide though. In the Inception fandom in particular, the general depiction of characters seems to have taken on a life of its own. I feel like 75% of the characterisations of Arthur and Eames can't be traced back to the original movie characters in any way, which isn't necessarily a bad thing because canon =/= fanon and all that, but it's strange to see it happen on such a scale. Like, where did repressed!Arthur even come from?!
Arthur as a reader makes no sense to me, though, unless it's in AUs. I can see Eames as a reader, because I interpret him as someone who's actually quite academic and well-read based on his comments while planning out the job in the movie.
(no subject)
(no subject)
/ramble ;)
(no subject)
A good sense of the humanities just fits with his character. Arthur's all action-action-action. When he fights, it's choppy. He never comes across as academic. Knowledgeable, yeah, because he's Cobb's right hand man, but never academic.
(no subject)
OK, at least Remus is seen reading books in some capacity, but Arthur never mentions any inclination towards reading. At all.
(no subject)
(no subject)
*Remus does have chocolate in his pocket on two occasions in PoA, but both occasions were when he and students would likely be encountering dementors or a boggart-dementor. He's never seen eating the stuff.
(no subject)
Personally, I'd love to see a fanfic in which Remus has dyslexia or something.
Now, Sirius, on the other hand, must have done quite a bit of reading while researching the animagaus transformation. (See icon.)